Committee Considers Anti-Monopoly Bill For Health Care Entities
By Whitney Downard
Indiana Capital Chronicle
INDIANA — The House Public Health Committee had a busy Tuesday, Jan. 16 morning, unanimously advancing four bills related to mammograms, dentistry, mental health services and the Indiana Department of Health.
But the largest and most wide-ranging bill wasn’t called for a vote, with Rep. Brad Barrett, the committee’s chair, saying he wanted to hold the bill to allow for committee amendments before their meeting next week.
Testimony on the insurance transparency and hospital ownership bill drew mixed reviews, with some concerns about regulations for pharmacy benefit managers.
Bill author Rep. Donna Schaibley, R-Carmel, welcomed more ideas as the bill travels through the process.
“We’re open for discussion and please reach out,” she said.
Bill Details
The bill borrows much of its contents from ongoing interim task force discussions to reduce the state’s health care costs, particularly by addressing the monopolization of health care entities and allowing employers and other health insurance sponsors to audit health claims data for no fee.
As Schaibley detailed, the health department would be tasked with creating a database of ownership information for Indiana’s health care entities, which includes hospitals, physician group plans, third party administrators, insurers and pharmacy benefit managers. The bill includes non-compliance penalties.
“Consolidation was a major topic of the task force. Hospitals and insurers are buying practices, which is causing consolidation. There are so many studies that are showing that consolidation increases prices,” Schaibley said. “There’s also concerns (with) private equity groups…”
Private equity groups, for-profit investment organizations that traditionally overtake a business for a short time to restructure it and resell at a profit, have grown in recent years after such entities devastated local media outlets, fisheries and long-term care providers, as detailed by ProPublica.
Schaibley shared a study from the Journal of American Medicine that reported a 25% increase in adverse events after a private equity acquisition. The influence of private equity in Indiana’s health care landscape is unknown.
Elsewhere in the bill, pharmacy benefit managers and third party administrators couldn’t bar contract holders — employers who offer insurance plans, health plans, Medicaid or managed care organizations — from requesting audits of health claims once a quarter and couldn’t charge for the service.
The above portions of the bill were applauded by various employers’ groups, including the Indiana Manufacturers Association.
“How our members, the employers, interact with the third party administrators, the brokers and the insurance companies is a critical part of the whole dynamic,” said Andrew Berger, the senior vice president and lobbyist for the organization.
Certain other fees imposed by those PBMs and TPAs, such as those for waiving bundled services, are also prohibited but attracted more consternation.
Rep. Martin Carbaugh, R-Fort Wayne, noted that streaming services frequently include similar fees for waiving bundled program offerings.
Joey Fox, on behalf of the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, the national trade group for PBMs, also noted worries about the inclusion of ERISA plans, or health plans that fall under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Such plans have been difficult for legislators to regulate in the past, due to federal prohibitions.
He noted that roughly 44 of the nation’s 66 PBMs operate in Indiana, meaning there is plenty of competition in the space when it came to fees.
Other Bills In Public Health
Barrett, R-Richmond, also heard testimony on his agency bill for the Indiana Department of Health, which addressed several provisions related to home health care, food temperature management and the eviction process for long-term care facilities.
Rachel Swartwood, the agency’s legislative director, explained that current law barred individuals convicted of certain crimes from working in long-term care facilities but not from home health care. The aims to prohibit those convicted from home health as well.
Additional bill provisions include: uniform temperature control guidelines for food preparation, allowing the Family and Social Services Administration to share mental health records with the health department’s child fatality review teams and using administrative law judges for the eviction process.
Lawmakers also passed two amended bills, one requiring more health care guidance to people with dense breast tissue, a dental licensing compact and another requiring the state to foot the bill for Hoosiers involuntarily committed to mental health facilities.
The latter, House Bill 1216, builds on previous work from author Rep. Greg Steuerwald, R-Avon, to reform the state’s mental health services. Jails and prisons are some of the state’s largest mental health providers and a bill he authored last year to ease payment for such services at the facility level for Hoosiers who aren’t incarcerated.
“The intent here, just like (House Enrolled Act 1006) last year, is to ensure payment for services provided,” Steuerwald told the committee.
Steuerwald said the bill’s aim was to continue providing care to people even after their discharge by guaranteeing payment for services.
Additionally, the bill would allow doctors overseeing intake to consider the testimony of friends and family members before signing off on an involuntary commitment.
Beth Keeney, the president and CEO of LifeSpring Health Systems, said that expansion of information was crucial for community mental health centers like hers. She shared the story of a parent seeking help for their adult child, who was unaware of the severity of their mental illness.
She said she had to refer the parent to the police because the person wasn’t an established patient or someone the doctors had screened.
The bill passed the committee unanimously.